Suivez-Nous sur TwitterTrouvez-Nous sur Facebook
English
  • North Pole could be ice free in 2008
    Envoyer cette vidéo à vos ami(e)s
    Obtenir le code d'intégration de la vidéo
    Envoyer cette vidéo par:
    Suivez-Nous sur TwitterTrouvez-Nous sur Facebook


    Envoyée le vendredi 25 avril 2008 12:31:03
    par newscientistvideo
    Vue 54684 fois
    3.6 / 5
    12345
    104 vote(s)

    Read more: http://environment.newscientist.com/article/dn13779-north-pole-could-be-ice-free-in-2008.html?DCMP=ILC-hmts&nsref=news1_head_dn13779

    Watch a series of satellite images taken from October 1, 2007 to mid-March 2008 showing changes in Arctic ice.



    facebook
  • Écrire votre commentaire ici...
  • evandanger547

    LIES!
    samedi 24 mars 2012 10:39:29
  • gramosjr7

    What happens when you die? Have you told lies, stolen, used God's name in vain(10 Commandments)? If yes, then you're a liar, thief, and a blasphemer in the sight of God. When you die & be judged by God, you'll be guilty of sin, & go to Hell! But God sent His Son Jesus to shed His blood & die on a cross for your sins, He was buried & rose again from the dead on the third day. If you'll believe the Gospel(Jesus died for your sins,was buried & resurrected)you'll not perish & have eternal life
    mercredi 19 octobre 2011 00:52:20
  • rolex2136

    BUT IT AINT
    mardi 23 août 2011 07:35:51
  • bigdaddysdigs1966

    his just shows that even the people that think they are the smartest in the world have no clue what mother nature will do they just keep saying things to keep their jobs at forcasting. wouldn't we all like to keep our jobs ad be wrong all the time
    mercredi 03 août 2011 15:06:24
  • EnvyMy75

    this video was posted IN 2008!
    mardi 19 juillet 2011 19:05:04
  • bomerman104

    2011 and still here and it will soon 2012 and ill still be here
    jeudi 30 juin 2011 12:50:23
  • 1965ace

    ht tp ://redwhitebluenews.co m/?p=7670
    mercredi 25 mai 2011 21:38:01
  • uknowispeaksense

    omg. okay. I watched the video. Dodgy charts, unpublished nonsense. I have a question for you. How does the cosmic dust not burn up when entering our atmosphere to form the nuclei of clouds? I reckon that might be a monumental oversight in his theory. Well, this is going nowhere. I'd keep providing science and you'd keep providing pseudoscience in a neverending waste of each other's time. Have a good life.
    vendredi 29 avril 2011 10:05:24
  • uknowispeaksense

    cont.... I would say however that the 'debate' is choking under the weight of denial propaganda exaggerating the effect of the sun in observed warming today.
    vendredi 29 avril 2011 03:27:46
  • 1965ace

    You got to be kidding me, three propaganda videos from the same source calling any one who disagrees "deniers" , well count me in. Those fools never talk about the influence of the solar cycles, the true source of global warming / cooling. Real scientists are more concerned with solar flares on our electronic society than MMGW. If our Sun burps in the wrong direction we can kiss our electronics good by and yet there is plenty of propaganda denying the sun has any effect.
    jeudi 28 avril 2011 20:31:09
  • 1965ace

    I see your into the greenie movement. The ultimate solar energy is oil, natural gas and coal. If your looking for a real solution for real energy for the future I suggest you look at thorium fluoride reactors.
    mercredi 27 avril 2011 12:54:45
  • uknowispeaksense

    I see. First did you watch the link? Second, what about theclimate scientists in Australia, Great Brittain, Russia, New Zealand, China, Japan, Germany etc etc etc etc who aren't dependent on research money? I do agree with your final comment that the US is on track to becoming an idiocracy but it hasn't got anything to do with climate policy. Perhaps if your country spent a bit less on war mongering you're debt mightn't be so high.
    mercredi 27 avril 2011 02:37:32
  • uknowispeaksense

    cont... closely. Despite not being able to accurately verify the sources, the graphs are deceptive in that they appear to be from cherry-picked data and aren't representative of the long term trends. The fact that they aren't properly referenced is a concern. I wouldn't take them seriously if they were on a non-dodgy site like Watt's. I have a link for you to check out. It is a youtube video. watch?v=-wbzK4v7GsM
    lundi 25 avril 2011 23:59:49
PUBLICITÉ
Suppléments
Réseaux sociaux
Nuage de tags
Retour en haut
Copyright © 2010 Prise1