Improved Hubble Shows Evidence of Dark Matter

Improved Hubble Shows Evidence of Dark Matter

Adresses courriel de vos ami(e)s...
Envoyer cette vidéo par: Prise1 Hotmail Gmail Outlook ou Thunderbird...

Envoyée le vendredi 11 septembre 2009 03:21:00
par tdarnell
Vue 39008 fois

4.9 / 5
550 vote(s)

As you may be aware, in May of this year, NASA launched its final mission to the HST to perform an upgrade. During this tricky mission, the astronauts replaced several key instruments with brand new ones, making the HST into an essentially brand new telescope.

Now anybody who's watched this channel for any length of time knows how I feel about the HST, I think it's one of the most important scientific instruments ever created. It has shown us views of our universe and provided context of our place within it in a way that has never before been done by anything since the invention of the telescope itself.

So it shouldn't come as any surprise that these latest images from the Hubble's upgraded cameras are among the most amazing ever taken.

Here's a sample of the latest images from the new and improved Hubble Space telescope released earlier this week.

All Animations Courtesy NASA/ESA and can be found here:

http://www.hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2009/25/

Music used:

Celtic Dawn:
http://www.audiosparx.com/sa/summary/play.cfm/sound_iid.239916

Techno Galactica:
http://www.audiosparx.com/sa/summary/play.cfm/sound_iid.277201

facebook

Écrire votre commentaire ici...

nascar51523fan

fuck the bible
lundi 14 mai 2012 14:59:39
1989TXag

There is plenty of scientific evidence that clearly opposes Christian teachings--specifically the first book of the old testament.
jeudi 19 avril 2012 19:56:13
Mogley52

WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that an airplane or cell originated by undirected natural laws. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
vendredi 13 avril 2012 22:55:14
Mogley52

EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
vendredi 13 avril 2012 22:54:36
Mogley52

HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME? When you divide a cake, the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?
vendredi 13 avril 2012 22:53:35
Mogley52

CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. If universe is left to itself, all energy will become useless and the universe cannot sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
vendredi 13 avril 2012 22:52:41
Mogley52

NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from sea sponge to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibria, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
vendredi 13 avril 2012 22:52:27
Mogley52

RANDOM GENETIC MUTATIONS caused by the mindless environment are destructive. Even if mutations are not immediately harmful, after enough of them accumulate they will be harmful. And, even if a good mutation does occur, for every good mutation there will be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, being harmful to the species as a whole and even causing extinction, not upward evolution. Most biological variations are from new combinations of already existing genes, not mutations.
vendredi 13 avril 2012 22:52:04
Mogley52

GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information, like other forms of information, cannot happen by chance, so this is the best explanation.
vendredi 13 avril 2012 22:51:48
Mogley52

"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: We were simply ignorant of their usefulness. Recent research published in journals such as Nature shows that these "non-coding" segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Just because these segments of DNA don't code for proteins doesn't mean that they useless or broken-down genes. Read Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
vendredi 13 avril 2012 22:51:07
Mogley52

NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced. Natural selection can only "select" from variations that are genetically possible and which have survival value. If a biological variation occurs that helps a species survive (i.e. change in skin color, etc.), that survival is called being "selected." That's all that natural selection is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Nothing more!
vendredi 13 avril 2012 22:50:51
Mogley52

WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
vendredi 13 avril 2012 22:50:31
Mogley52

APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
vendredi 13 avril 2012 22:50:17

« [1] 2 3 … 8 9 10 »