Suivez-Nous sur TwitterTrouvez-Nous sur Facebook
English
  • History channel - Battle of Cynoscephalae 3/3
    Envoyer cette vidéo à vos ami(e)s
    Obtenir le code d'intégration de la vidéo
    Envoyer cette vidéo par:
    Suivez-Nous sur TwitterTrouvez-Nous sur Facebook


    Envoyée le samedi 12 décembre 2009 17:52:37
    par DocumentaryMacedonia
    Vue 28652 fois
    4.8 / 5
    12345
    63 vote(s)

    During the march there was a heavy rainstorm, and the morning after there was a fog over the hills and fields separating both camps. Despite this, Philip resumed his march, and his troops became confused and disoriented. Philip then sent a small force to take the Cynoscephalae hills. Flamininus, still unaware of Philip's location, sent out some cavalry and light infantry to reconnoiter, which engaged Philip's troops on the hills. The battle on the hills grew fierce and Flamininus sent 500 cavalry and 2,000 infantry as reinforcements, mostly Aetolians, forcing Philip's men to withdraw further up the hill. Philip now sent more men into the melee, his Macedonian and Thessalian horse, who drove the Romans down the hill, until the Aetolian cavalry stabilized the situation. Philip, though reluctant to send his phalanx into the broken, hilly terrain eventually ordered an assault with 8,000 men when he heard of the Roman retreat. Flamininus positioned his troops on the field as well. He left his right wing in reserve, with his elephants in front, and personally led the left wing against Philip. Meanwhile Philip's phalanx had reached the summit, and after joining with their light troops and cavalry which he placed on his right wing, Philip had his phalanx charge down the hill into the oncoming legionaries. As the Roman left was slowly being driven back, Flamininus took command of his right and ordered an assault there.

    Philip's right wing was now on higher ground than the Roman left, and was at first successful against them. His left wing and center, made up of another 8,000 phalangites, however were still disorganized and in marching formation, so they had not even formed the phalanx yet, and as Flamininus sent his elephants charging into them, they routed. After breaking through, one of the Roman tribunes took twenty maniples (a smaller division of the legion) and attacked the Macedonian right wing from behind. The Macedonians were unable to reposition themselves as quickly as the Roman maniples. Now surrounded by both wings of the Roman legion, they suffered heavy casualties and fled.



    facebook
  • Écrire votre commentaire ici...
  • Stefanoitch

    No the soldiers in the phalanx formation was called a phalangite. In philips and alexanders time you had the Argyraspides (silver shields) Pezhetairoi ( foot companion) and asthetaroi ( chosen companion). These were all professional soldiers. A hoplite is a citizen of a city state who served he's country in times of war. They had to pay for their own gear
    jeudi 17 mai 2012 06:57:36
  • 0zzy07

    0:30 he needs to chill out
    jeudi 10 mai 2012 15:46:05
  • Lobos222

    Because that worked so great at the Battle of Cannae.
    vendredi 04 mai 2012 21:08:56
  • WarSmurfs

    A hoplite IS what a soldier in a phalanx is called --'
    mardi 01 mai 2012 06:34:12
  • tacotony24

    Congratulations Rome - you're the better army
    lundi 30 avril 2012 01:58:06
  • MegaKingofSparta

    its not true, hes a troll
    mardi 17 avril 2012 00:13:16
  • Eryk Podgorski

    they could have made a flanking defence thing and pushed behind the legionares with the cavalry. they also had skirmishers left anyway!
    vendredi 13 avril 2012 17:10:15
  • FoxKnightJ07

    As vaguely like the Germans did***
    jeudi 05 avril 2012 19:36:13
  • FoxKnightJ07

    But for arguments sake Alexander's phalanxes would have had the Roman centre pinned and his Hypaspists would have guarded his flanks from heavy/med infantry manoeuvres, his light cavalry would have protected his flanks from skirmish troops or ad-hoc assisted his Thessalonian cavalry with holding the Roman cavalry at bay while his Companions would have swooped in from some unexpected angle to hog all the glory with some sort of a death blow and/or an 'oh-shit-I-fucked-up' save manoeuvre.
    jeudi 05 avril 2012 19:32:18
  • MTCoblivsicas12345

    no alexander didnt he had a set battle plan in every one of his battles and when Alexander went to India he lost because of the elephants which is what Rome had this time. Indeed, Alexander was a fantastic general, however Romes tatics were modern and adaptable compared to the phalanx thats why its known as the Roman War Machine.
    mardi 03 avril 2012 20:58:33
  • stud20084977

    You seem to be ignoring completely what this video showed that the Roman commander didn't even need to be as perfect as Alexander, the Roman way of fighting and the way of organising their command structure offered so much more freedom and initiative that anyone would have a hard time defeating them. Plus you seem to be ignoring the other part of my post that states that the Romans advantage is also due to the fact that their equipment where superior to anything the greeks had to offer...
    mardi 03 avril 2012 17:31:38
  • Degreezzify

    the game is called "Rome II total war" just if anyone wants to try it
    dimanche 01 avril 2012 17:08:34
  • SubTachyon

    Alexander or Hannibal may have been greater generals than what the Romans had available most of the time, but Romans had the infrastructure. Even if you managed to win battles against the Romans, you couldn't win the war.
    lundi 26 mars 2012 10:23:09
PUBLICITÉ
Suppléments
Réseaux sociaux
Nuage de tags