Suivez-Nous sur TwitterTrouvez-Nous sur Facebook
  • Apple Mac Pro (8-Core) first look
    Envoyer cette vidéo à vos ami(e)s
    Obtenir le code d'intégration de la vidéo
    Envoyer cette vidéo par:
    Suivez-Nous sur TwitterTrouvez-Nous sur Facebook

    54 7
    Envoyée le dimanche 22 mars 2009 13:59:40
    par Technetgate
    Vue 33007 fois

    Whether you're editing feature films or scoring them, composing symphonies or visualizing mass spectrometry analyses, Mac Pro makes it easier than ever to create your personal dream machine: A powerful system that not only meets your needs today but, thanks to an ingeniously designed enclosure, expands easily to meet tomorrow's challenges as well.

  • Écrire votre commentaire ici...
  • The President of The Internet

    If only Apple still made desktops like this - the imac is a laptop with a stand and dont even start me on the trashcan
    mercredi 06 janvier 2016 18:54:21
  • andros1984

    A 4-year old Mac Pro is the way to go if you agree $5000+ is ridiculous.
    lundi 22 octobre 2012 02:03:51
  • Lars Bindels

    You must put The fan cover to The left for taking out the cards
    mercredi 07 mars 2012 10:46:20
  • UltraDrago2000

    @HeadShot360IN First of all I respect the fact that you say your a windows fan, what pisses me off is you saying that you can't afford a cheap 3500$ computer and then saying the best os in the world is shit compared to your virus ridden corpse of an os.
    vendredi 10 février 2012 07:00:42
  • TSD Killa

    5000$ wtf man
    vendredi 30 décembre 2011 10:37:02
  • nk52wln

    did you not hear him say, 2 processors. that means we could get "12 cores" . GPU model, speeds, size and bit counts, ram speed,size and timings matter. SO SUCK ON MY DICK, WANKER COS WE CAN MAKE A BETTER MACHINE FOR A FRACTION OF THE PRICE, FANBOY. TROLOLOLOLOL
    mercredi 13 juillet 2011 15:54:17
  • LordJummy

    get a sweater that fits, or pull your sleeves up
    mercredi 09 mars 2011 21:26:21
  • krystian1333

    @xMaJiiCz You still need good graphics, CPU dosent make your comp get better graphics. learn your shit
    samedi 20 novembre 2010 03:49:48
  • 2s7a2m7

    2:01 WRONG. Too bad apple sucks.
    samedi 30 octobre 2010 19:07:15
  • HeadShot360

    i'm a windows fan, but i have to admit, apple sure makes stuff look good, like holy crap all the insides are polished metal, but their prices and Operating system is sub-par. Hell even my commadore 64 is better than apple operating sysshit (troll's way of saying system)
    mercredi 06 octobre 2010 23:09:39
  • Max C

    "What's good today is also good tomorrow." What about the day AFTER tomorrow? O:
    mercredi 14 juillet 2010 22:24:42
  • ImperialArmour

    This is a situation where the typical low-end hardware is found even on the most ridiculously priced macintosh.
    jeudi 10 juin 2010 01:05:50
  • NelizMastr - Tech for PC & Mac

    @pkerry12 I deny the existance of Vista, but I stay Windows user though. Just dont have the cash laying around :(
    jeudi 20 mai 2010 11:07:51
  • gumberly

    this really has 16 cores. both chips support hyper-threading which double's your cores...
    jeudi 15 avril 2010 16:09:19
  • WeeklyDrive Productions

    @Mirrors997 can you not go through 3 month old comments and mind your own business? k
    lundi 15 mars 2010 16:15:24
  • Mirrors997

    So now you're going to ignore my post from before calling you out on your bs. You said the Xeon was substantially more powerful than the i7, which is an utter lie sir. I saw that you own a nice 4GHz i7 on your PC and I really wouldn't be surprised if it could beat your Mac Pro from time to time. Do you understand the concept of multi threading? Lets try a little experiment. Run Cinebench on your Mac and try to beat 27,000, which is what anandtech got from a PC.
    dimanche 14 mars 2010 15:07:14
  • Mirrors997

    You're seriously misinformed. The Xeon 2.66GHz processor is almost identical to the i7 920. The only differences is support for multiple CPUs and ECC RAM.
    dimanche 14 mars 2010 14:54:36
  • Mirrors997

    Then explain the following quote you said earlier, "The i7 is Quad core, first of all, and is 2x less powerful than a comparable Intel Xeon Quad processor." Any expert would know that the Xeon Nehelem and Core i7 Nehelem are both nearly identical and the performance difference is next to zero. If you were also an expert, you'd realize that sometimes cores don't scale how you'd expect them to, so performance from an octo might not demolish a quad.
    dimanche 14 mars 2010 14:52:44
  • Mirrors997

    I'm calling bs on you owning a Mac Pro. I don't understand how anyone who could own such a powerful machine could be so ignorant about computers. First of all, the Nehelem Xeon is the Core i7 in server form and is hardly any different. Second, I was comparing a 2.26GHz octo vs 3.8GHz quad in photoshop, in which the quad wins because of the higher clock speed. Cores don't scale linearly so you can't expect 2x the performance from a second processor.
    dimanche 14 mars 2010 14:02:41
  • David di zilva

    if u max it out u can make it get up to $16000
    dimanche 14 mars 2010 03:57:34
Réseaux sociaux
Vidéo vedette